Sunday, November 2, 2008

The New York Knicks: A Shakespearean Tragedy



Watching the Knicks play basketball is painful. It’s like watching the D’Antoni Suns without all the good players…which means it’s like stabbing yourself in the eye with rusty, disease-ridden scissors: you’re immediately pained by sharp things being in your eye and you’re in a world of trouble later when you develop cancer or something.

The Knicks live and die by the three. They take three-pointers almost as often as everything else, and they miss about 70% of the time. Under D’Antoni, they’re doing a great job of passing the ball, but it’s ugly to see four quick passes in rapid succession (that’s double quick!) and then see Richardson, Crawford, or Robinson lob a bomb that inevitably bounces off the front of the rim into the prepared hands of an opposing frontcourt player. And that’s the best part: opposing big men know that the bucket is going to rim out or whatever and so they’re uber prepared to get the board, but the Knicks frontcourt? Clueless. They think it’s going in every time and so they’re out of sight before the ball is halfway to the hoop. If they just accepted that it’s going to bounce off way more than half the time, they could have a number of offensive rebounds and good, solid putbacks. Instead, they’re left with an empty possession and a fast hustle up the court to the other basket because of a fast-break opportunity. That’s painful to watch.

And all of the players on this roster seem ill-suited for, um, basketball. Or rather, they seem ill-suited for basketball that requires a team effort. They seem more prepared for street ball in Philadelphia than professional ball in New York Fuckin’ New York. Sure, I just said they pass the ball well, but that doesn’t mean they play team basketball. That just means the ball is moving hands. What happens is the ball moves hands, a lot, and then someone eventually decides it’s up to them to take the shot. So you’ll see the ball go from Robinson to Randolph to Crawford back to Randolph for the turn around jumper off the double team. Or sometimes you’ll see this weird circular passing thing that happens where the ball will go all the way around the perimeter and back until someone takes the misaligned three pointer (missing it, of course). Duhon will run up the court, stop at the top of the key, throw the ball to Crawford in the corner, who will immediately throw it back to Duhon (which the defense NEVER saw coming, right?), who will fake throwing it back to Crawford and instead “surprise” everyone by throwing it to Richardson in the other corner, who was open earlier, but not anymore, and still fires the three anyway.

What it comes down to is this half-hearted effort to take in D’Antoni’s system. They pass the ball well, but they still think that everyone on the team sucks and so each person will take it upon himself (or herself, in the case of Randolph [it’s the manboobs]) to drive ineptly to the basket or pull up short and take the jumper (because they see Kobe do it every night). The only difference is that Kobe is ridic (or Jordan, or Iverson, or Melo, or Wade, and occasionally James [at the pull up jumper specifically]).

Here’s an example that just happened: the ball movement was good, and eventually it came around to Malik Rose on the wing. Rose, in typical fashion, decided that if everyone was just going to pass it, he was going to take it to the rim (muttering “silly bitches” under his breath, for sure). So he dribble fakes, drives to the rim, gets by his defender surprisingly, and just past the rim he tries to do a reverse layup in the manner of Dwayne Wade. Unfortunately, his hand didn’t get high enough and before he could even release the ball, it hit the bottom of the rim (clunnnnggg!). Rose got fouled and so he had a chance for mini-redemption, but it didn’t matter; the damage was done.

What seems apparent with the Knicks is an influx of ego. Every player was recruited by Isiah Thomas in the past and given a bigger salary than they were worth, and immersed in an environment of me-first living, which automatically translated to the basketball court. All of the scandals and turmoil surrounding the organization over the past few years helped mold the players into solid egoistic basketball playing both because everyone else was doing it and because it was probably safer to think about your own neck in such a hotbed of shit and frustration. If you made better stats than the next guy, you had a higher probability of staying on when the inevitable roster implosion occurred. So D’Antoni has to work against this mountain he inherited, work against the entrenched psychological mindsets of his entire roster. They are confronted with something entirely new and in contrast with Isiah-ball and they’re not sure if they should open themselves up to it. They think it’s still safer, for the first year, at least, to play egoistically so when the real roster implosion occurs, they’re not cut.

Paychecks are paychecks and after a tenure inside Madison Square Garden, it’s unlikely other teams are going to pick you up before March. Anyone want aging, overweight frontcourt players? Randolph and Curry. Wild, shoot-first point guard with no respect for team games? Marbury. Awful, me-first ball players with little use for fundamentals? Robinson, Richardson, Crawford, Rose, blah blah blah the whole damn team


4 erotic poetry prompts:

Clifton November 2, 2008 at 11:26 PM  

Jacking up the three relentlessly is part of that D'Antonian philosophy that "we don't need offensive rebounds, 'cuz we'll just outrun you to death." Seven seconds or less. It's the basis of his philosophy. Run down, jack up any kind of haphazard shot, then hope the other team misses, lather-rinse-repeat.

Now, my following opinion should be read with the following disclaimer: I'm not saying D'Antoni's tenure in Phoenix was a failure, nor am I saying that I liked the way that management passive-agressively uncomfortabled him out of town. (In fact, I thought that was kind of a dick move.)

And one other thing. D'Antoni will hereafter be referred to as Mike because I'm already sick of typing capital D, apostrophe, capital A. Gets my fingers tangled up, for some reason.

Mike came to Phoenix and immediately turned around a Suns franchise that had been sucking the tailpipe of the league for several seasons (thanks in no small part to Mike's newest BFF Stephon Marbury, I might add). Now, was it Mike's system by itself, or was it the fact that he had several players who were a perfect fit for the system?

There is no one else in the league who possesses Steve Nash's ability to heave the ball in the general direction of the basket while falling backwards and to the side and having the ball float through the rim as if he'd dropped it in from the top of the backboard -- EVERY TIME he does it. Ideally suited for "quick, run down the court and jack up a shot!" basketball. Amaré, Crash Barbosa, J'aime des Croissants Diaw, der Matrix, and the other various cogs were equally good fits.

So the Suns hire Steve Kerr, and I think he saw through Mike's system for what it was-- fantastically entertaining during the regular season, but draining, and easy to figure out when you had to play the same team five or six games in a row. S'why the Suns looked so lost against the Spurs; by that point, San Antonio had written the book on how to defeat The System.

Mike decided that it wasn't his system's fault, and I envision an exchange along the lines of "Oh yeah? I bet I could go to THE KNICKS and implement my system and win!", and Kerr double-dog-dared him, so we are where we are today.

No, seriously, I think Mike is such a believer in his system that he figured he could literally go anywhere, with anyone, and make it work. But like you described, what he failed to realize in New York is that he's absolutely stuck with that ragtag bunch of humongously overpaid losers. He benched Marbury, hoping he could force management to deal him, and I just read an article on ESPN that said Donnie Walsh is going to have a sit-down with Stephon and Mike to "resolve the situation." Translation: he's gonna tell Mike that Stephon isn't getting paid $21,000,000 to rock a Joseph Abboud on the bench. Marbury has said he won't accept anything less than his entire year's salary as a buyout, and he's as untradeable as they come. And look at the other guys D'Antoni has to work with: you mentioned Man-Tits Randolph, and for God's sake, I think *I* could outrun Jerome James, and I'd even let someone kick me in the shin first. Nate Robinson's cute in a mascot kind of way.

I just got up to go get some gummi snacks and forgot why I was so fired up about this topic. Whatever. Kobe sucks.

--CG

The Filthy Logician November 3, 2008 at 7:24 AM  

Haha.

Now that's out of the way:

I think D'ANTONI's run was hugely successful here, totally, and I also think it can work. I mean, hey, he made it to the Western Conference Finals twice and nearly won both times, so that counts for something.

And part of his winningness in Phoenix was the players, and the other part was his philosophy. In New York, hes got just his philosophy. Haha. He might pull it out, though, if he can get those kids to pull their shit together.

I think Marbury should play myself. He's a good player who seems to have been working his ass off and keeping his mouth shut. So I'm a little surprised he's not playing. You'd think D'ANTONI would love having Marbury over Duhon. Hmmm.

Who knows. We'll see.

Clifton November 4, 2008 at 8:43 PM  

Well, I'll be danged. Looks like Marbury WILL get paid $21,000,000 to rock a Joseph Abboud on the bench.

-----------------------
ESPN.com-- The New York Knicks have no plans to do anything with Stephon Marbury, except pay him his $21.9 million salary and give him a great seat to watch all their games.

Knicks coach Mike D'Antoni and team president Donnie Walsh said that they will not waive, buy out or trade Marbury. They also will not let him play in games, unless there is an injury to their top three guards, Chris Duhon, Jamal Crawford and Nate Robinson.

After Walsh met with both D'Antoni and Marbury on Monday, the Knicks announced Tuesday that they feel the issue is dead. Marbury will be inactive until further notice.


"It is resolved," D'Antoni told a larger-than-usual contingent of reporters after practice on Tuesday. "It is. Pretty soon that story is not going to be fun to read because it is going to be the same old story.

"You are going to be beating a dead horse," he said.

Marbury, 31, was the face of the Knicks under Isiah Thomas, but D'Antoni has been lukewarm, at best, toward Marbury since training camp. So why keep the former All-Star, who has been a distraction in the past, on the team?

"It is a lot of money," D'Antoni said. "He has a contract, rightly so. If somebody gets hurt, we might need him. Why not? Steph has been great. He is part of the team. We are trying to do what is best for the Knicks."

Walsh said the case is "closed" on the Marbury controversy. Walsh said that he leaves playing time decisions to his coaches and does not interfere. Still, why keep Marbury on the team if there are no plans to play him?

"He is a good player," Walsh said.
-----------------------